
THEOLOGY OF THE LAITY
BY FR JOHN SAWARD
Ordained Anglican Clergyman in 1972 and received with his
family in the Catholic Church in 1979.
Fr John
Saward has previously been Professor of Dogmatic Theology at
the International Theological Institute (a Papal institute
of graduate theology in Gaming, Austria). Born in Middlesex
in 1947, he is married with three daughters
Having read
Philosophy and Psychology at St John's College, Oxford, from
1965 to 1968, he went on to study Theology and to train for
the Anglican ministry at St Stephen's House, Oxford. He was
ordained as an Anglican clergyman in 1972. In 1973 he was
awarded a M. Litt. in theology, for which he had submitted a
thesis on 'The Theology of Death' under the supervision of
Father Cornelius Ernst OP of Blackfriars, Oxford.
After two years as a curate in Lancashire, Saward returned
to Oxford in 1974 as Chaplain and Junior Research Fellow in
Theology at Lincoln College. In 1979 he and his family were
received into the Catholic Church at Campion Hall, Oxford.
From 1980 to 1992 Saward was Lecturer in Dogmatic Theology
at Ushaw College and from 1992 to 1998 Professor of
Systematic Theology at St Charles Borromeo Seminary in
Philadelphia, USA.
Fr Saward is the author of eight books and many booklets,
articles, and contributions to collected works. He was
ordained deacon on 21st June 03 and was ordained priest (for
the Archdiocese of Birmingham) later in the year.
|
The Theology of the Laity
Part 2
by Fr John Saward
The
sensus fidei
In addition to the grace to witness prophetically to Christ,
the laity, with the rest of the Church, have been given a
supernatural 'sense
of the faith' (sensus
fidei):
The totality of the faithful, anointed by the Holy One
(cf 1 John 2. 20 &
27), cannot err in
believing. This characteristic of theirs is manifested by
the whole people's sense of faith, when "from
bishops to the last of the laity",
they manifest a universal consent in matters of faith and
morals. By this sense of faith, which is aroused and
sustained by the Spirit of truth, the People of God, under
the guidance of the Sacred Magisterium and faithfully
obedient (obseguens) to it, receives not the word of men,
but, in truth, the Word of God
(LG 12; cf 35).
In other words, through the Holy Spirit of Truth, Christ our
Lord has given the
whole body of believers a supernatural and infallible
instinct of orthodoxy. Now this is a doctrine that is
frequently misinterpreted. For example, it is sometimes
claimed that if a large number of the laity in theory or in
practice reject some aspect of the Church's teaching, the
doctrine in question cannot be regarded as the sure truth of
Jesus Christ. Such a view contradicts the text we have just
cited from Lumen
Gentium. The
sensus fedelium
is a grace common to all the faithful ('from
the bishops to the last of the laity'),
so there can be no opposition between the laity's sense of
the faith and the authentic Magisterium of the Church as
exercised by the Pope and the bishops in communion with him.
The individual believer participates in the Church's
sensus fidei
only insofar as he is guided by and faithfully obedient to
the Magisterium. A layman who refuses to accept that
guidance is manifesting not his God-given sense of the faith
hut the unformed state of his conscience and the
incompleteness of his submission to the Word of God. There
have, of course, been occasions in the Church's history when
the laity have shown greater steadfastness in their fidelity
to the Magisrerium than those to whom the exercise of that
Magisterium has been officially entrusted. As Cardinal
Newman reminds us, after Nicaea, in the struggle against the
Arian heresy, 'the
Catholic people ... were the obstinate champions of Catholic
truth, and the bishops were not'.
Bishops like Athanasius, Basil, the two Gregories, and
Ambrose stood bravely against the Arian establishment, but
they were exceptions. 'The
governing body of the Church came short, and the governed
were pre-eminent in faith, zeal, courage, and constancy'
(The
Orthodoxy of the Body of the Faithful during the Supremacy
of Arianism, ed. J.
Coulson., p. 1091).
The sense of faith cannot be determined statistically or
sociologically. It is not 'public
opinion', current
tendencies, the latest fashion in theology. As a
distinguished German theologian has written:
We
are dealing here wIth the capacity to judge and to bear
witness in those who have faith, who open themselves to
the reality of Christ and His Spirit, who Tive
consciously in the community of the Church, which is the
Body of Christ and the place where the Spirit Is
manifested In a unique way. People with a private faith
of their own, the representatives of a 'vague
Christianity', those who are prepared to identify
themselves only partially with the Church, cannot make
the sensus fidel a reality
(Leo Scheffczyk,
'Sensus fidelium - Zeugnis in Kraft der Gemeinschaft',
Internationale
Katholische Zeitschrift
16 (1987), 432).
The sense of
faith is not the achievement of individuals but a corporate
gift shared by the whole Church. Just as it is the universal
Church which is the primary believer, so it is the
Una Sancta
as a whole to which, to whom, the sure instinct of orthodoxy
is to be attributed. It is because she is Christ's Bride and
Body, in intimate union with her bridegroom and Head,
animated by His Holy Spirit of Truth that she cannot err in
either believing or teaching. The individual believers who
compose the Bride enjoy the sense of faith only insofar as
they live deep in their heart. The Virgin Mother of God, who
goes before us as our supreme model of faith, is the one who
personally embodies the Church as Virgin Mother and
Immaculate Bride. It is, therefore, she too, with her never
failing Yes, with her treasuring of the things of Jesus in
her heart, who most beautifully and clearly exemplifies the
sense of faith.
The Kingly Mission of
the Laity
According to Vatican II, the laity share in Christ's
kingship, first of all, by their self-denial, by conquering,
by God's grace, the reign of sin in themselves, letting
Christ the King rule in their hearts; and secondly by
serving Christ in their brethren, leading them, by patience
and humility, to the King 'whom
to serve is to reign'
(cf LG 36). For Pope John Paul in
Familiaris Consortio,
the Christian family manifests its royal dignity by being 'a
community at the service of man'
(631),
a service of life and love, a service of both the Church and
society:
Just
as Christ exercises his royal power by serving us, so
also the Christian finds the authentic meaning of his
participation in the kingship of his Lord in sharing his
spirit and practice of service to man (FC 63).
The laity,
like all the baptized, enjoy a royal freedom, the glorious
liberty of the children and heirs of God. To serve the
Triune God is indeed perfect freedom. To share in the
incarnate Son's obedience to the Father is to be on fire
with the Spirit who is freedom. The grace of Christ the King
is a power of liberation from the fetters of self-will, from
the enslaving cravings of concupiscence. The truth of
Christ, faithfully treasured and infallibly taught by His
one true Church, sets us free from error and unmeaning, from
ideology and fantasy, from the fads and fancies of worldly
wisdom. If we let the grace of Christ take hold of us and
change us, if we say Yes to His Catholic truth in the
Church, we reign with the King of Kings. For, as St Leo once
asked, 'What is there
more princely than the soul submitted to God?'.
The Universal Call to
Holiness
According so the Second Vatican Council, every single member
of the Church, whatever his state of life, is 'called
to holiness'
(cf LG 39).
The layman, as much as the cleric or religious, has the
vocation to be a saint. The God revealed in the Old and New
Testaments is infinitely holy, a God of incandescent purity,
a God who is wholly other, transcending all earthly things.
Now this holy God wants His people to be holy too: 'Be
holy, for I am holy . . . you shall be holy, for I the Lord
your God am holy'
(Lev. 11. 44; 19. 2).
He wants Israel to reflect something of His 'wholly
otherness' by
dedicating herself exclusively to Him. A 'holy
nation'
(cf Ex. 20. 3)
is one that has 'no
other gods', that
lives in whole-hearted fidelity to the covenant. In the New
Testament the one, true, holy God is revealed as the Holy
Trinity. The Father sends His consubstantial Son, God as He
is God, holy as He is holy, to assume human nature and, in
and through that human nature, by His Cross, Resurrection
and sending of the Holy Spirit, to sanctify mankind. 'And
for them do I sanctify myself, that they also may be
sanctified in the truth'
(John 17. 19, Douai
version). The
universal call by the holy Son of God who has become their
brother: 'You,
therefore, must be perfect, as our heavenly Father is
perfect'
(Matt. 5. 48).
Our Lord does not speak these words to the Twelve alone but
to the whole multitude listening to Him. Sanctity is for
all.
In the Old Testament, as we have said, to be holy is to live
in fidelity to the covenant. In both Old and New Testaments,
that covenant fidelity is compared to marriage. The very
purpose of the Incarnation and saving work of the Son of God
is to wed humanity to Himself, to be in Himself, in His
blood, the new and everlasting covenant, and so to draw us
into a holy life of communion with the Father in the Holy
Spirit. As Lumen
Gentium teaches
us:
Christ, the Son of God, who with the Father and the
Spirit is celebrated as 'alone holy', loved the Church
as His Bride, giving Himself up for her, in order to
sanctify her. (Cf Eph. 5. 25-26) He loined her to
Himself as His Body and crowned her with the gift of the
Holy Spirit to the glory of God. Everyone, therefore, in
the Church, whether belonging to the hierarchy or cared
for by it, Is called to sanctity
(LG 39).
The members
of the Church must be holy, for the Church is herself
Christ's sanctified Bride. The holy soul is the soul with
the attitude of Christ's Bride, holy Church, an 'ecclesiastical
soul', as the
Fathers put it. Being holy means letting oneself be loved by
the Bridegroom, surrendering oneself in love to Him who
loved us and gave Himself up for us. It means identifying
oneself with the 'holy
and immaculate'
Church (cf Eph. 5.
27) in her devotion
to her Lord and Head
(cf LG 39). Such a
statement would be mere poetry, a hopeless abstraction, were
the Church no more than an impersonal organisation. In fact,
the Church is a person, a holy person of flesh and blood. In
Our Lady we find the perfect personal realisation of the
Church as spotless Bride and Virgin Mother. To be holy is to
be the Church. To be holy is to be like Mary.
Holiness for All: the
Witness of the 'New Movements'
One of the most encouraging signs of hope in the Church
today is the commitment of so many of the 'new
movements' to the
sanctification of their lay members in and through their
daily life and work. it was certainly at the forefront of
the apostolate of Monsignor Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer,
the founder of
Opus Dei. He
once described the aim of the Work as follows:
To
love and serve God there is no need to do anything
strange or extraordinary. Christ bids all men without
exception to be perfect as His heavenly Father is
perfect. Sanctity, for the vast majority of men, implies
sanctifying their work, sanctifying themselves in it,
and sanctifying others through it. Thus they can
encounter God in the course of their daily lives....
Since the foundation of the Work In 1928, my teaching
has been that sanctity is not reserved for a privileged
few. All the ways of the earth, every state of life,
every profession, every honest task can be divine (cited
in S. Bernal,
Mgr. Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer,
p. 130).
Father Luigi
Giussani, the founder of
Communione e Liberazione,
has shown how, through His canonized saints, God encourages
us all to be holy, to see that a real Christian life is
possible:
Sanctity, or holiness, is not merely an "exception"
within the Church.... [Canonized saints] were chosen to
be examples that would teach all those who have been
called, in greater depth, what the nature of their
relationship with the mystery ideally ought to be.
Adrienne von Speyr has written in this connection: "The
saints demonstrate that Christianity is possible; it Is
for this reason that they act as guides on a road to the
charity of God that would otherwise seem an impossible
path." In the physiognomy of the saints and in the path
they have followed, we can discern, as If under a
magnifying glass, the true features of holiness and the
necessary steps for travelling the path they have
already taken (Morality, Memory and Desire, p. 96).
Our own dear CRUX, too, places the 'pursuit
of holiness in private and public life'
at the forefront of its aims. This is the goal of all our
strivings, the reason, ultimately, for our attendance at
this conference. Why are we here? Surely, to help and
encourage one another, by God's grace, to grow in holiness,
to follow Our Lord in His Church with ever greater fidelity
and love.
Becoming What We Are
In his epistles St Paul regularly addresses the Christians
to whom he writes as 'saints'
(cf Eph. 1.1).
At the same time he urges them to live holy lives; they
already are holy, and yet they must strive to become holy.
They are saints who are 'called
to be saints'
(cf Rom.1.7).
The members of the Church in Corinth, having been
'sanctified in Christ Jesus', are 'called
to be saints together with all those who in every place call
on the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and
ours'
(1 Cor. 1. 2).
How are we to understand this paradox of a sanctification
already accomplished yet still incomplete? In Baptism we are
truly washed clean and sanctified by the blood of the Lamb.
The alienation we inherit from Adam is ended, living
communion with the Trinity established. We are made sharers
in God's holy Trinitarian life as children of the Father,
members of the Son, temples of the Spirit. That is what we
objectively, really, are by the grace of our baptism. 'See
what love the Father has given us, that we should be called
children of God; and so we are'
(1 John 3. 1).
The vocation of holiness is the vocation to become what we
are in baptism. Baptism plants in us a seed of holiness; the
aim of our Christian life of earth is to help that seed bear
the rich and beautiful fruits of the Spirit
(cf Gal. 5. 22).
As the Fathers of Vatican II say, we must, with the help of
God, 'hold on to and
perfect in [our] lives that sanctification which [we] have
received from God'
(LG 40).
We cannot become what we are without costly struggle. When
we were baptized, the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ wholly
and completely remitted the guilt of Original Sin. But the
painful effects of Original Sin remain, especially
concupiscence, the disorderedness of our desires. As the
Council of Trent teaches against Martin Luther, this 'tinder
of sin', though it
comes from sin and inclines to sin, is not sin in the just;
it becomes sin only when we consent to it with our will. It
is not, as Luther thought, a source of harm but rather a
challenge to be resisted manfully by the grace of Jesus
Christ (cf DS 1515).
In other words, the Christian struggle begins at home, on
the doorstep of our souls.
The Way to Holiness
is the Little Way
If the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ is to bear fruit in
holiness, it must take hold and transfigure our whole life
and being, all our thoughts and words and deeds. Holiness
does not consist in extraordinary or extravagant deeds, but
in childlike confidence in God, in humble charity, in
glorifying the Trinity and serving our neighbour in the
ordinary small circumstances of daily life. The only way to
holiness is the Little Way.
When I say 'the only
way', I am not
exaggerating, for that is what Our Lord Himself teaches: 'Truly,
I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you
will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven'
(Matt. 18. 3).
As Pope Benedict XV said, spiritual childhood is obligatory
for all. In the teaching of St Therèse of Lisieux, the
Little Way is little in two senses. First, it is the way of
spiritual infancy or childlikeness. It means trusting and
abandoning ourselves in a childlike way to our heavenly
Father, giving up our proud pretensions and remembering our
poverty and utter dependence on God:
[To
remain a child] is to recognize one's nothingness, to
expect everything from the good God, as a little child
expects everything from its father. (Derniers
Entretiens, p.
119).
The Little
Way is not a psychological technique. It is a grace given us
by Jesus. It is He who is 'the
elevator' that lifts
us up to the Father. After all, it was in littleness, as a
little baby conceived by the Spirit in the womb of the
Virgin, that the consubstantial Son came to us from the
Father. And in a certain way, in His human nature, in His
meek and lowly Heart, Jesus always remained little before
the Father. It is not for nothing that St Thérèse calls
herself: 'Sister
Thérèse of the Holy Child Jesus and of the Holy Face'
and sometimes 'of the
Holy Child Jesus of the Holy Face'.
She sees that from childhood to Gethsemane and Golgotha the
incarnate Son seeks only to do the will of the One he calls
'Abba'.
The second sense in which, according to Thérèse, the way to
holiness must be a
Little Way is that it is a matter not of outwardly grand
deeds for God, but of simple fidelity and love in the little
details of life, for these unspectacular duties of the
present moment are a kind of sacrament, enshrining the will
of our loving provident Father.
So
long as our actions, no matter how trivial, remain
within the focus of love, the Blessed Trinity . . .
gives them a wonderful brilliance and beauty. When Jesus
looks at us through the little lens, which is to say
Himself, He finds all our doings beautiful. But If we
abandon the ineffable centre of love, what does He see?
A few straws . . . besmirched and worthless deeds (cited
in Hans Urs Von Balthasar,
Thérèse of Lisieux.
The Story of a Mission, p. 183).
It is
important not to sentimentalise the Little Way. It is not an
uncatholic anti-intellectualism. St Thérèse said in her
final months: 'All I
have ever sought is the truth'.
The Little Way is a sure path to the truth. To be like a
child is to have a mind and heart in touch with reality,
unobstructed by the fantasies of worldly wisdom. Both Plato
and Aristotle thought the path to wisdom began with wonder.
The mysteries of the Kingdom are fittingly revealed to mere
babes (cf Mart. 11.
25ff), because
babes, unlike grown-ups who think they know it all, are
ready to receive the truth. The Little Way is not
childishness. On the contrary, it is the way to true
fullness of Christ. In St Thérèse's case, while we remember
her as a Little Flower, we tend to forget her admiration of
St Joan of Arc, her sense of the Christian life as a
spiritual battle: 'Sanctity',
she once said, 'has
to be won at the point of the sword'.
We forget too easily the struggles and darkness of the last
period of her life. There is no contradiction in this.
Childlikeness concerns our attitude, through Jesus, to the
Father; to the world, Our Lord tells us, we must show
mature, soldierly vigilance. To the world we must be as wise
as serpents; with God, as simple as doves
(cf Matt. 10. 160).
There is no contradiction, no hypocrisy, in this. Once more,
our model is Jesus. In relation to the Father, we are lambs
in the Lamb of God; in relation to the world and Satan, we
are lions in the Lion of Judah.
The Call to Holiness
- the Call to Love
Holiness, the perfection to which Our Lord calls us, is
perfection in charity, loving God above all things and our
neighbour because of God
(cf LG 42).
The holy God is a God of love, the Trinitarian God whose
innermost life is an eternal consubstantial communion. To be
holy is to participate in the holiness of the Trinity and
thus in the Trinity's life of love. 'God
is love, and he who abides in love abides in God and God
abides in him'
(I John 4. 16).
It is the whole man that is called to love. As Pope John
Paul II teaches us in
Familiaris Consortio:
As an
incarnate spirit, that is a soul which expresses Itself
in a body informed by an immortal spirit, man Is called
to love in his unified totality. Love Includes the human
body, and the body Is made a sharer In spiritual love
(FC 11).
Human beings
are neither angels nor brute beasts, but creatures of flesh
and blood and spirit in a wonderful unity. It is in the
wholeness of our humanity that God wants us to love. Now,
according to divine revelation, there are two ways in which
the whole human person can respond to God's call to love:
marriage, and virginity or celibacy
(cf FC 11).
In marriage man and woman give the whole of themselves in
love to one another in a lifelong, indissoluble union, and
in so doing they dedicate their whole selves to God. As
Father von Bahhasar says:
In
the married state, the Christian, by his sacramental
'Yes', gives his body and soul to his spouse - but
always In God, out of belief in God, and with confidence
In God's bountiful fidelity, which will not deny this
gift of self the promised physical and spiritual fruit (The
Christian State of Life,
p.238).
The celibate
person, renouncing sexuality for the sake of the Kingdom of
Heaven, devotes his whole being, body and soul, with an
undivided love, to God. These two ways of Christian loving,
the married and the celibate, are not in tension with each
other; on the contrary, they are mutually protective. It is
only because the Church regards marriage as so great that
she regards its renunciation as something greater
(cf Trent, Session 24, Canon
10; DS 1810). In the
words of our Holy Father:
Virginity or celibacy for the sake of the Kingdom of God
not only does not contradict the dignity of marriage but
presupposes it and confirms It ... When marriage is not
esteemed, neither can consecrated virginity or celibacy
exist; when human sexuality is not regarded as a great
value given by the Creator, the renunciation of it for
the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven loses its meaning (FC
16).
It is no
wonder, then, that the Church which has never failed to
treasure celibacy is now, in the modern world, the sole
defender of Christian marriage and family life. Both
celibacy and marriage are consecrated under vow. This is
because they are the two Christian ways of responding in
love to the God of love. According to Father von Balthasar,
'every true love has
the inner form of a vow'
(The Christian
State of Life, p. 39).
The one who loves wants to devote himself totally, body and
soul, to his beloved. On the Cross the incarnate Son gave up
His All in love for the Father and the Church, His Bride.
Christian vows, first of Baptism, then of Marriage or
Celibacy, are all ways of responding to that devoted love.
Love and Obedience
Love of God is incarnate as obedience to God. This truth,
fundamental to the Gospel of St John, indeed to the whole
New Testament, has been beautifully developed in our own
times by Father Hans Urs von Balthasar and Adrienne von
Speyr. Their treatment of obedience is Trinitarian,
Christological, Marian, and ecclesiological. In the eternal
life of the Trinity the co-equal Son loves the Father in the
Holy Spirit. When the Son assumes human nature, including a
human will, He expresses His love for the Father, both
divine and human, in the form of obedience unto death, even
death on the cross: 'I
do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may
know that I love the Father'
(John 14. 31).
Moreover, just as in the inner life of the Godhead the Holy
Spirit is the mutual love of Father and Son, so it is under
the impulse of the Spirit, whose grace fills His human
heart, that the incarnate Son obeys the Father. According to
Adrienne von Speyr, for the Son as man, the Spirit is the 'Rule'
of the Father (by analogy with the rule of a religious
order). Through the gift of the Holy Spirit, the Church and
all her members are taken into the loving exchange of Father
and Son. Once again, this takes the practical form of
obedience. 'If a man
loves me,' says
Jesus, 'he will keep
my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to
him and make our home with him'
(John 14. 23).
The way of holiness is the way of charity and thus of
obedience, seeking and doing God's holy will. 'Not
every one who says to me, 'Lord, Lord" shall enter the
Kingdom of Heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who
is in heaven'
(Matt. 7. 21).
The supreme example of this loving obedience to Jesus and
His Father is Our Lady. When Our Lord says that 'whoever
does the will of my Father in Heaven is my brother and
sister and mother'
(Mark 3. 35),
He reveals to us the heart, the immaculate heart, we might
say, of Our Lady's divine Motherhood: for she conceived the
divine Word in her soul, by faith and loving obedience,
before conceiving Him in her body. By the grace that fills
her from her conception, the Blessed Virgin is the first
human person to share in the obedience of the Son. This is
what we mean when we say that she is 'first
Church'
(cf J. Ratzinger & Hans Urs von
Balthasar,
Maria-Kirche im Ursprung).
She is the first to live in the relation-
ship to the Son, and thus to the Father and to the Holy
Spirit, to which the whole Church is predestined.
There is a beautiful circle of grace connecting the
obedience of Jesus and Mary. Historically, Our Lady's
fiat
precedes the obedience of Jesus, for it is she who gives Him
His human nature, including the human will with which He
does the Father's will. But the
fiat
of Mary at the Annunciation, while truly hers, is also truly
the achievement of God in her, the flowering of the grace
that has filled her from her conception, the grace which is
the redeeming grace of her Son, the grace flowing from His
Cross and thus from His obedience to the Father. The
Yes
of Mary makes possible the
Yes
of Jesus, but it is also true that the
Yes
of Jesus makes possible the
Yes
of Mary. Mary's obedience is an anticipated participation in
the obedience of the Son.
To love God means to say
Yes
to Him, wholeheartedly and without reserve, and such
obedience is the only way to holiness. This is the unanimous
teaching of all the saints and spiritual masters of Catholic
Tradition.
The
highest perfection (says St Teresa of Avila) consists
not in interior favours or in great raptures or in
visions or in the spirit of prophecy, but in the
bringing of our wills so closely into conformity with
the will of God that, as soon as we realise He wills
anything, we desire it ourselves with all our might, and
take the bitter with the sweet, knowing that to be His
Majesty's will (Foundations,
5).
'Little
Teresa', St Thérèse of Lisieux, expresses the same truth
with typical simplicity: 'Perfection
consists in doing His will, in being what He wills us to be'.
And how is God's will disclosed to us? In the law and the
prophets, in the Ten Commandments, but above all in the
teaching of God incarnate, Our Lord and Saviour Jesus
Christ, the teaching faithfully guarded and infallibly
proclaimed by the Church He built on Peter. In addition,
there is the natural law, the law written in our hearts,
whose voice is conscience. Of this too the Magisterium of
the Church is the God-appointed interpreter, as Vatican II
clearly teaches:
The
Church is, by the will of Christ, the teacher of the
truth. It is her duty to give utterance to, and
authoritatively to teach, the Truth which is Christ
Himself, and also to declare and confirm by her
authority those principles of the moral order which have
their origin in human nature itself (DH 14).
Love of God
is incarnate as obedience to God, but obedience to God is
incarnate in ecclesial obedience, following the Church's
teaching in its fullness and faithfully observing the duties
of our state of life. The religious lives out his obedience
to God through fidelity to the rule of his order; the priest
through that obedience to his bishop which he promised at
his ordination; the layman through fulfilling the
responsibilities of family, professional and social life.
Finally, every Christian, with the help of the Church's
teaching, strives to discern and to do God's will as
manifested, through His Providence, in the concrete
circumstances of daily existence. To quote the Council:
All
of Christ's faithful will day by day grow in holiness in
and through all the conditions, duties, and
circumstances of their lives If they accept everything
in faith from the hand of the heavenly Father and
co-operate with the divine will by showing everyone,
through this earthly service, the charity with which God
loved the world (LG 41).
The Call
to Holiness is a Call to the Cross
We are made holy by the blood of the Lamb, by the Sacrifice
He offered to the Father on the Cross
(cf Heb.10. 10).
If we are to be holy, to hold onto and to be transformed by
the grace of our crucified Head, the grace first given us in
our Baptism, then we must enter ever more deeply into His
Sacrifice, the Sacrifice He gives us to offer in an unbloody
and sacramental way, through the ministry of priests, in the
Mass. The attitude of holiness is the attitude of the
crucified Son; arms outstretched in total openness to the
Father and all-embracing love of sinners; an attitude of
adoration, confession, thanksgiving, supplication; the
attitude of wholehearted self-giving love. The only way to
sanctifying union with the Father is Jesus and His Cross. No
one has set this out more clearly than St John of the Cross.
In the Ascent of
Mount Carmel he
shows us how Our Lord reconciled the human race to God at
the moment of His own extreme desolation and abandonment by
the Father. The journey to union with God, he concludes, 'does
not consist in recreations, experiences, and spiritual
feelings, but in the living, sensory and spiritual, exterior
and interior death of the cross.'
(2, 7. 11). The Cross is truly the crux of holiness, the
heart of the matter. Day by day, in the pains and trials of
life, we have the opportunity to shoulder our own crosses in
loving imitation of Our Lord, to the glory of the Father and
for our own and others' sanctification. We should thank God
that our movement places the faithful Cross before our eyes,
even in its very name.
Holiness and Love of
Neighbour
Christian perfection is perfection in charity, love of God,
and of neighbour because of God. Our Lord commands us to
love one another, as He loved us
(cf John 15.
12).
And St John tells us that since God loved us so much that He
gave His only Son to be the expiation for our sins, we ought
to love another (cf
John 4. l0f). It is
the Incarnation, the hypostatic union of divinity and
humanity in the person of the Word, that unites love of God
and love of neighbour. In becoming man, God the Son has in a
very real sense united every human being to Himself
(cf GS 22);
He has made Himself the Head and Elder Brother of every
human being. He has made our humanity, my neighbour's and
mine, His very own. So to close my heart against my
neighbour is to turn away from Jesus. And conversely to love
and serve my neighbour is to love and serve Jesus. As the
Lord Himself teaches us, 'Inasmuch
as you have done it to the least of these my brethren, you
have done it to me'
(cf Matt. 25. 40).
Mother Teresa of Calcutta has on many occasions pointed to
the link between the contemplative adoration of Jesus in the
Blessed Sacrament, which begins her sisters' day, and the
love of Jesus in the poor which occupies all their other
hours. Listen to her own words:
Tell
them ... tell them that we are not here for the work, we
are here for Jesus. All we do is for Him ... We serve
Jesus in the poor. We nurse Him, feed Him, clothe Him,
visit Him, comfort Him in the poor, the abandoned, the
sick, the orphans, the dying. But all we do, in our
prayer, our work, our suffering is for Jesus. Our life
has no other reason or motivation. . . . Whenever a
visitor comes to this house, I take him to the chapel to
pray for a while. I tell him: "Let us first greet the
Master of the house. Jesus is here; it is for Him we
work, to Him we devote ourselves. He gives us the
strength to carry on this life and to do so with
happiness. Without Him we could not do what we do ...
Jesus explains our life . . . We do it for Jesus" (E. Le
Joly, We Do It
for Jesus, p.
12f).
Father von
Balthasar has said this of Mother Teresa:
What
never occurred to Indian wisdom in all its sublimity -
to gather up the dying from the streets of Calcutta -
has been accomplished by the foolishness of Mother
Teresa, who has thus "enlightened" all the holy gurus as
to how and why Christianity is a human religion, (New
Elucidations, p.
86).
Our love of
Jesus, like our faith in Jesus, must be Catholic, whole,
total. We must love Jesus in His divine and human wholeness,
in His every state, wherever He is to be found: in the bosom
of the Father, in Mary and the saints, in the Eucharist
(where He is really, truly, substantially present in a
unique sacramental way), in the Church His Body, in the Pope
His Vicar, in bishops and priests, in our neighbour. in the
sick, the poor and the hungry, in the unborn child, in the
last, the lost, the little, and the least. This is the
layman's, every Christian's vocation - to do it all, to love
all, for Jesus. He can have no finer watchword that the
title of Father Faber's great hymn, 'All
for Jesus'.
The Formation of the
Laity: The Recommendations of the Council
In the sixth chapter of their Decree on the Lay Apostolate,
the Fathers of Vatican II say that the laity must receive
suitable training for their mission in the Church and the
world. This formation should be realistic, reflecting the
distinctively secular character of the layman
(cf AA 29).
It is intended to prepare laymen, not priests or monks, for
their witness to Christ in the world. Since laymen are
specially charged with the renewal of the temporal order,
they should be 'instructed
in the true meaning and value of temporal things, both in
themselves and in their relation to the total fulfilment of
the human person'
(AA 31).
Both the Fathers of Vatican II and the bishops at the 1987
synod use the word 'integral'
to describe the formation they recommend: the lay apostolate
can only be effective 'through
manifold and integral formation'
(AA 28);
the 'integral
spiritual formation of all the faithful, lay, religious and
clergy, should be a pastoral priority today'
(Synod Message).
There should be a wholeness about the formation given the
laity; it should be Catholic in the most fundamental sense
of the word, It should present the faith of the Church as a
beautiful Christ-revealed whole. The laity have the right to
receive from their pastors the teaching of the Church on
faith and morals in its undiminished richness and integrity.
The formation of the laity should also be integral in the
sense of embracing both spirituality and doctrine
(cf AA 29),
overcoming what Father von Balthasar has called the most
tragic divorce in the history of the Church, the separation
of theology and spirituality. The layman should be helped to
see that holiness is nothing other than dogma lived, living
the orthodox Catholic truth cf Christ in faith, hope, and
charity.
According to
Apostolicam Actuositatem,
lay formation should also be integral in the way that it
takes account of the God-created unity and integrity of
human nature. It should educate the whole person. It should
strive to overcome any dualism of theory and practice.
Citing the teaching of Pope Pius XII, the Fathers recommend
that, from the very beginning, 'the
laity should gradually and prudently learn how to view,
judge and do all things in the light of faith as well as to
develop and improve themselves and others through action,
thereby entering into the energetic service of the Church'
(AA 29).
Formation for the lay apostolate should be promoted within
the Catholic family by parents, in parishes by priests, in
Catholic schools and colleges by teachers. It is also very
much the business of lay groups and associations:
Frequently these groups are the ordinary vehicle of
harmonious formation for the apostolate since they
provide doctrinal, spiritual and practical formation.
Their members meet in small groups with their associates
or friends, examine the methods and results of their
apostolic activity, and measure their daily way of life
against the gospel (AA 30).
CRUX and
the Formation of the Laity
CRUX includes formation for the lay apostolate among its
fundamental aims and objectives.
in
general, it helps a member by providing him with a
spiritual way of life suitable for his special vocation;
assisting him to train himself through its meetings,
publications and training sessions; and encouraging him
by welcoming him into a community of Catholics who share
the same views and aspirations.
The Gospel
Enquiry, which has a central place at the Cell Meeting, is
aimed at deepening the members' knowledge. understanding and
love of Our Lord, thereby helping them to do what
Apostolicam Actuositatem
recommends - measuring their lives against His Gospel. The
method of the enquiry is, again, precisely what is outlined
by the Council Fathers: 'seeing,
judging, acting'
(CRUX);
'viewing, judging,
doing'
(AA).
The lay apostle contemplates and then translates his
contemplation into action. He looks on Our Lord with the
eyes of faith and love and then, with due judgement and the
help of grace, 'thinking
with the Church', he
tries to co-operate with the work of the Redeemer in the
world.
The perfect example of this type of spiritual and apostolic
life is the most Blessed Virgin Mary, Queen of Apostles.
While leading on earth a life common to all men, one filled
with family concerns and iabours, she was always intimately
united with her Son and cooperated in the work of the
Saviour in a manner altogether special. Now that she has
been taken up into heaven, 'with
her maternal charity she cares for these brothers of her
Son, who are still on their earthly pilgrimage and are
surrounded by dangers and difficulties, until they are led
into their blessed fatherland'
(LG 62).
All should devoutly venerate her arid commend their life and
apostolate to her motherly concern
(AA 4).
Our Lady is the model for the layman, for every believer, in
all that is universal and therefore most fundamental in the
Christian life: faith, charity, and union with Christ
(cf LG 63).
if we want to know what it means to witness to Christ and
live a holy life in the world, then we should turn to Mary.
Her Yes - to the Incarnation of her Son in her womb by the
Holy Spirit, to the mysterious challenge of His ministry, to
His Sacrifice for the sins of the whole world on Calvary -
is the fundamental attitude of all Christian faith and
prayer and active service of God and neighbour. During the
1987 Synod on the Laity the Holy Father led a Marian prayer
vigil in which he spoke as follows about what Our Lady can
teach the layman:
Mary
not only goes before us in that total "Yes"
to God, but she also teaches us to make that
Yes
our own in the circumstances in which each one of us is
called to live (L'Osservatore
Romano (1987),
n. 41, p. 18).
It is a
woman, the Blessed Virgin Mary, not a man, who is the
supreme example of what it is to believe in Christ and
surrender oneself to Him. Only in the light of Mary can we
understand why the necessary maleness of the ministerial
priesthood does not in any way imply the inferiority of the
Christian laywoman. The impossibility of women's ordination
derives from the incomparable dignity of woman in the sexual
order of God's creation and the supernatural order of
redemption and the Church. The apostles and bishops and
priests who share their ministry are not Christ; by
ordination, through natural resemblance, these weak and
sometimes foolish men are mere icons, sacramental signs, of
the Bridegroom-Priest. For the sake of their brethren, the
office bearers simply 'represent'
the Son made man and male. The Blessed Virgin is and does
something far greater. She is not a priest as the Apostles
are, for she does not represent someone else: she is the
Mother Of God, the one who in faith and love gave flesh and
blood to God the Son, and she is the Church, the Church's
personal embodiment as immaculate Bride, femininely open and
receptive to the divine Bridegroom. The Church as a whole is
feminine, open to receive
the life and truth of her Head; the male hierarchy, by
contrast, is only one part, with the humble vocation to
serve the feminine Marian whole. As Father Manfred Hauke has
said in a book described by the late Father von Balthasar as
'the definitive work'
on women and the priesthood:
in
the figure of Mary, it is quite clearly manifest that
the clergy do not constitute the real essence of the
Church but only represent Christ's redemptive work
within a more comprehensive whole that is Marian in
character. An official priest has no claim to a higher
kind of Christian being but bears a specific sort of
responsibility. This is related to, and supported by,
the priesthood of all believers, which is reflected
especially in the tasks that fall to women (Women in the
Priesthood, p.482).
Consider the
typical icon of Pentecost. There is no denying the
importance of the necessarily male office-bearers (Peter is
there with his keys). But there is also no doubt who is the
heart and centre of the Spirit-filled apostolic Church: the
praying Mother of God.
Mary our Mother
The layman, by his baptism, is an adopted child of God the
Father, a son in the Son. But that is not all: he is also a
child of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The incarnate Son has
shared His All with us - He has given us the power to be the
children of His heavenly Father and from the Cross He gave
us his human Mother to be our Mother in the order of grace.
Was it not sufficient for the incarnate Son to make us the
children of God? Why did He share His Mother with us too?
What difference does Our Lady's spiritual motherhood make to
us? Father Louis Bouyer has argued that Christians who
accept that they are adopted sons of the Father but spurn
the very thought of being children of Mary are guilty of a
kind of Docetism, a dehumanised Christianity.
If,
in this new and, in a sense, divine life, we did not
come from a human Mother, our new birth would do
violence to our nature. it would not be a fulfilment but
a supernatural mutilation. Divinized by grace, a
humanity . . . with a relation to the Father in heaven
but without a relation to the Mother on earth would be
inhuman . . . There is a Docetism in regard to
ourselves, to our new life as children of God. We are
bound to succumb to it if we fail to acknowledge that
Mary is our Mother in the life of grace, the life of
grace, the life which is but the expansion in us of her
Son's. The attitude of the Christian who imagines that,
at the level of grace, it is sufficient to have a
heavenly Father, and unnecessary to have an earthly
Mother, is highly equivocal. Is he not supposing that
Christian life and ordinary life have to remain on
different levels, with nothing in common? it is hard to
think of an idler fancy. There is no Christian life
which is other than ordinary life, but it is this life
placed under the immediate governance of God, without,
for all that, being in the least severed from its roots
in history (L. Bouyer,
Le Trône de la Sagesse,
p. 239f).
Since the
grace of the Word made flesh fulfils and does not destroy
human nature, it is supremely fitting that we who, by
nature, have both mothers and fathers should have both
divine Father and human Mother in the supernatural order. Of
course, Mary's Motherhood in the order of grace
(cf LG 61),
though supremely fitting, is not to be explained by any kind
of necessity; it depends, as
Lumen Gentium
says, on 'the
disposition of God'
(LG 60).
Mary's mothering of us is the Trinity's free gift: eternally
willed by God the Father, entrusted to us in time by the
crucified Son, lived out in the Church in the power of the
Spirit.
In Redemptoris
Mater the Holy
Father has given us rich teaching on Mary's spiritual
Motherhood. It began on earth in her co-operative consent to
the Incarnation and Sacrifice of her Son, through which we
are given rebirth as children of God:
Already on earth she co-operated in the rebirth and
development of the Church's sons and daughters, as the
Mother of that Son whom the Father "placed as the
first-born among my brethren" (RM 44; cf LG 63).
And, from
Heaven, where she reigns in glory of body and soul, Our
Lady, by her intercession, continues to embrace us with her
motherly love:
For, taken up to
Heaven, she did not lay aside this saving role, but by her
manifold acts of intercession continues to win for us gifts
of eternal salvation . . . Mary's motherhood continues
unceasingly In the Church as the mediation which intercedes
(RM 40).
All life, all holiness, comes to us from the Father, by the
working of the Spirit,
through the glorified humanity of the Son, and so passes
through the prayers and the love of His and our Mother. Just
as the divine Head was conceived in the flesh 'by
the Holy Spirit and from the Virgin Mary',
so His members are reborn as sons of God through the power
of the Spirit and the prayers of Mary. Such is His will,
says St Bernard, 'who
wanted us to have all things through Mary.'
But what is the relation between the believer's sonship of
God and his sonship of Mary? Our Lord shared His Mother with
us because He wants us to receive the Kingdom like children.
He wants us to go to Him and the Father in the way He came
to us from the Father - little and lowly and in the arms of
Mary. The experience of receiving the grace of Christ from
the hands and love of His human Mother helps us to be more
humbly childlike in our approach to Him and His divine
Father. For the Mother is herself the supreme example of
that humility and childlikeness. To go to Jesus through Mary
is the 'Little Way'.
It is a regular and significant feature of Marian
apparitions that the seers emphasize Our Lady's youthful
appearance. In the fourteenth century the English mystic,
Lady Julian of Norwich, saw her 'as
a simple maiden and meek: young of age, little more than a
child'. St
Bernadette, too, stressed the childlikeness of the Beautiful
Lady. This can be interpreted in a number of ways. It is,
for example, in harmony with the fact that Our Lady probably
bore her divine Child in her mid-teens. It may be that it
teaches us something about the eternal freshness of the
glorified body. Or perhaps it is that Our Lady's physical
youthfulness, as revealed to St Bernadette and the others,
is an outward and visible sign of her inward and spiritual
disposition of perfect childlike humility, trust, and
self-surrender.
The eternal Son of the Father became true and perfect man in
the Virgin's womb in order, by His cross and Resurrection,
to make all things new, to rejuvenate a world grown old and
grey in sin, Our Lady, by anticipation, in the Immaculate
Conception, was the first to receive the rejuvenating grace
of her Son; for from the first moment of her existence in
the womb of St Anne, she was engraced as beloved adopted
daughter of the Father and temple of the Holy Spirit, the
grace that made possible the childlike quality of her faith.
By the grace that has filled her from the beginning, the
Blessed Virgin's assent to God's will is free of the tired
old cynicism, the mouldering mistrust, of the sinner. It is
a Yes
that is inextinguishably young. What I am trying to say has
been expressed with incomparable beauty by the great French
novelist Georges Bernanos in his
Diary of a Country Priest:
The
eyes of Our Lady are the only real child eyes that have
ever been raised to our shame and sorrow. Yes, lad, to
pray to her as you should you must feel those eyes of
hers upon you: they are not indulgent, for there is no
indulgence without something of bitter experience - they
are eyes of gentle pity, wondering sadness, and with
something more in them, never yet known or expressed,
something which makes her younger than sin, younger than
the race from which she sprang, and though a Mother, by
grace Mother of all grace, our little youngest sister.
What is the
relevance of these reflections about Mary and spiritual
childhood to the vocation of the layman? The answer is
simple. We have said that the layman, no less than the
priest or religious, is called to holiness, and that the way
to holiness is the Little Way. We are called to be holy, not
through extravagant gestures, but by childlike fidelity and
love in the fulfilment of the duties of our state. Mary,
lowly Handmaid of the Lord, is the most beautiful and
perfect example of this Little Way of holiness in the world.
Listen to these two stanzas from a poem by St Thérèse
written at the end of her life. It is called 'Why I love
you, Mary'. In it the Little Flower shows that Our Lady's
Immaculate Conception, far from making her remote and
unattainable, brings her into the closest solidarity with us
as model and Mother, for it is sin, not grace, which
isolates us from one another. After God, no one is nearer to
us, no one more accessible, than Mary full of grace. What is
more, says Thérèse, Mary's immaculate all-holiness is lived
out, not in outlandish experiences, but in the humble human
homeliness of Nazareth.
You
make me feel it's not impossible
To follow in your footsteps, O Queen of the Elect,
The narrow way to Heaven you have made visible.
Close to you, Mary, I like to stay small,
I see the vanity of woridiy grandeur.
When St Elizabeth receives a visit from you,
I learn to practise ardent charity.
In Nazareth, Mother full of grace, I know
You live in great poverty, wanting nothing more.
No raptures, no miracles, no ecstasies
Adorn your life, O Queen of Elect!
The number of little ones of earth is very great.
They can raise their eyes to you without trembling.
it is the common path, incomparable Mother,
You are pleased to tread so you can guide them to
Heaven.
As our
Mother, 'la petite
Marie' shares
her littlenes with us. Her prayer in Heaven is that we
should be conformed to the littleness of her Son, from whom
the grace of her
own spiritual littleness flows. In another poem by St
Thérèse, the Queen of Heaven addresses Sister Marie of the
Holy Face:
I am
looking for a chIld
Like Jesus, my only Iamb,
So I can keep the two of them together
in a single cradle
In her final
agonised months, plunged into the darkness of the Cross,
Thérèse clung to Mary like a little helpless child, calling
upon her, as she had done since Our Lady first smiled on
her, 'Maman',
'Mummy'.
It was in the arms of her Mother Mary, in the heart of her
Mother the Church, that she made the final gift of herself,
in union with Jesus, to the Father. In her writings, but
also in the way she lived and died, the Little Flower of
Lisieux has bequeathed the Church precious testimony to the
place of the Mother of God in the life and apostolate of
every Christian. Though herself an enclosed religious, she
is an example for us all.
The Rosary
In the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary, God has
given the Church an invaluable instrument for the spiritual
and apostolic formation of the layman. During the 1987 Synod
on the Laity, the Holy Father made the point as follows:
The
mystery of Mary is rich In possibilities that make for
an understanding of the lay charism . . . In the Rosary
even the most lowly and humble son or daughter of the
People of God can find the fullness of his or her
baptismal vocation, his or her prophetic, priestly and
kingly role, and finds in and through Mary an
extraordinary capacity to approach the heart of Christ
and of the Father . . . The Rosary, thanks to Mary,
brings the saving mysteries of Christ to shine on all
the circumstances and difficulties of our daily life and
transforms it all, raises it up and purifies it.
To pray the
Rosary is to look in love on Jesus and the mysteries of His
life, to look at Him from the perspective of His Mother, to
go to Him through His Mother. The Rosary - Christ-centred,
Trinitarian, Marian prayer - helps to draw the believer,
priest, religious or lay, into the attitude of Mary to
Jesus, and of Jesus to the Father. Like Mary and with her
help 'now and at the
hour of our death',
we ask to share in the obedience of the Son: 'Thy
will be done'. And
so we learn to make an offering of our lives to the glory of
the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
As it was in the
beginning is now and ever shall be world without end Amen.
ABBREVIATIONS
AA Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity:
Apostolicam
Acsuosuatem;
Vatican II
AG Decree on the Church's Missionary Activity:
Ad Gentes;
Vatican II
CIC Codex luris
Canonici
DH
Declaration on Religious Freedom:
Dignitatis Humanae;
Vatican II
DS
Denzinger-Schoenmetzer,
Enchiridion Symbolorum;
1976
FC
Familiaris Consortio;
Pope John Paul II
GS Pastoral Consitution on the Church in the Moden World
Gaudium et Spes:
Vatican II
LG Dogmatic
Constitution on the Church:
Lumen Gentium;
Vatican II
OT Old Testament
PO Decree on
the Ministry and Life of Priests;
Presbyterorum Ordinis;
Vatican II
RM
Redemptoris Mater;
Pope John Paul II
ST
Summa Theologiae,
St Thomas Aquinas
All quotations applied to CRUX and not attributed to any
other source, are taken from the CRUX booklet describing the
movement and its aims and methods. Quotations from the
documents are either the author's own or an adaptation of
the
versions of W M Abbott SJ and A Flannery OP.
Copyright © John Saward, 1994 and 2001
The author, John
Saward, was a clergyman in the Church of England. He and his
wife, and eventually their three children, all became
Catholics. Formely on the staff at St Cuthbert's College,
Ushaw, England for several years he then became Professor of
Dogmatic Theology at the Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary in
Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Since 1998 he has been Professor of
Dogmatic Theology at the International Theological Institute
(a Papal institute of graduate theology in Gaming, Austria)
The above article is a slightly revised version of a lecture
given at a CRUX conference in 1988. The article originally
appeared as a booklet published by CRUX Publications Limited
and is reproduced here with permission.
This Version: 7th February 2003
|